Recency: Internet Retailing Example  
          Drilling Down Newsletter # 28: December 2002
          
          
           
          
          
          Drilling Down - Turning Customer 
          Data into Profits with a Spreadsheet 
          ************************* 
          Customer Valuation, Retention,  
          Loyalty, Defection
          Get the Drilling Down Book! 
          http://www.booklocker.com/jimnovo 
          Now also available online through 
          
          Amazon and  Barnes & Noble 
          Check out: 
          The Marketer's Common Sense Guide to E-Metrics - 22 benchmarks to understand the major trends, key
          opportunities, and hidden hazards your web logs uncover.  I wrote
          this manual with Bryan Eisenberg of Future Now, the visitor conversion
          specialists. 
          Download a free white paper on the topic: 
          Marketer's Common Sense Guide to E-Metrics 
          Prior Newsletters: 
          http://www.drilling-down.com/newsletters.htm 
          ------------------------------- 
          In This Issue: 
           
          #  Topics Overview 
           
          #  Best of the Best Customer Marketing Links 
           
          #  Tracking the Customer LifeCycle: Recency  
          
          #  Questions: ROI in Multi-Step Promotions 
          -------------------- 
           
          Topics Overview 
          ============= 
           
          Hi again folks, Jim Novo here. 
           
          This month we've got the usual "best of" Customer
          Marketing article links, we explore the concepts of "new
          customer" and "customer" with the owner of
          IMissAsia.com, and roll up the old testing sleeves to dig down into
          the depths of control groups, random samples, and halo effects. 
          If  you're not in the data-driven mood, hey, read it next week -
          it will still be here.  Take some time off, relax and enjoy the
          season.  But perhaps you have a bit of time on your hands, as
          business activity grinds to a halt.  If you are in this
          camp,  
           
          Let's do some Drillin'! 
           
          
          Best Customer Retention Articles 
          ==================== 
          This section flags "must read" articles moving into the paid archives
          of trade magazines before the next newsletter is delivered. 
          If you  don't read these articles by the date listed, you will have to  pay
          the magazine to read them from the online archives. 
          Note to web
          site visitors: These links may have expired by the time you read
          this.  You
          can get these "must read" links e-mailed to
          you
          every 2 weeks before they expire by subscribing to the newsletter. 
Use the Web’s No. 1 Activity- Searching 
November 27, 2002  DM News 
For those who have been paying attention, search marketing found its way a long
time ago.  What better position for a marketer to be in than to snag people
actively searching for a product?  Think about it - how do you use the
web?  But you can waste a ton of money on search if you don't set it up and
track the results properly; if you need help, click
here. 
Furniture Retailer 
 Bolsters Analysis With Inhouse CRM 
December 5, 2002  DM News 
Say it isn't so!  People who signed up for a sweepstakes actually turned
out to be profitable mailing targets?  That's unusual, but goes to show
what you can do if you actually understand your own
data. 
           
          Tracking the Customer LifeCycle:
          Real World Examples 
          ===================== 
 If you are new to our group and want to review the previous
          LifeCycle metric - Latency - that discussion is here,
          along with the Real World examples 
          Hair Salon and B2B
          Software.  The previous piece on Recency is here. 
          Recency: The Web Retailing Example
           
          IMissAsia.com offers an e-mail newsletter on every page of the
          site.  The owner tries to create a broadly appealing piece,
          mixing some new content with links back to areas of the site
          experiencing high activity - specific discussion boards, products,
          news clips, etc.   
          The owner has always felt the visitor / customer should drive the
          direction of the site; if certain topic areas were getting the most
          traffic, then those must be the most interesting or attractive topics,
          and likely the ones with appeal to the most people.  This
          "swim with the tide, not against it" approach had always
          worked well in the past as a driver for newsletter content. 
          Within this content, the owner carefully mixed contextual sales
          opportunities directly related to the content, along with one or two
          more aggressive product pitches.  This formula had worked well
          and the newsletter drove a good chunk of sales. 
          But the owner of IMissAsia.com was getting worried about response
          to the newsletter, which has been falling.  Perhaps swimming with
          the tide was not a good idea, and the content should explore "not
          popular" issues and products?  Perhaps the product pitches
          were too frequent and aggressive?  Perhaps this market was just
          slowing down because of the economy?  Or worse, perhaps the owner
          had already "creamed" this market and the best days were
          over? 
          One thing the owner knew for sure - the percentage of total sales
          from new customers was falling.  Now, this could be a good thing,
          the owner thought, because it means more sales are coming from repeat
          buyers.  But it could be a bad thing, if what it means is the
          market is saturated and the best days are over.  How to resolve
          this question?  And how is the newsletter affecting this issue,
          if at all? 
          The owner thought a lot about new customers, repeat customers, and
          the newsletter.  What is a "new" customer, anyway? 
          Are they new only the day they make a first purchase?  Are they
          still new if they haven't made a purchase 30 days later?  60 days
          later?  6 months later?  Do they have to make a second
          purchase to not be "new"?  When do they stop being new? 
          For that matter, when is a customer not a customer any more? 
          If they purchased twice or more and have not purchased again for 6
          months, are they still a customer?  What about no purchase in 2
          years?  5 years?  When do customers cease to be customers? 
          What does the customer base of IMissAsia.com really look like? 
          The owner realized the only way to answer these questions was to
          actually look at the customer data, and to make decisions on what
          these ideas meant for this business.  Customer types for
          IMissAsia.com probably would not be defined the same way as a 
          customer types for Boeing, Wal-Mart, Oracle, or Ford.  No, these
          customer definitions needed to be based on the facts of this
          particular business model. 
          The owner also realized something else - if there are no
          definitions, there can be no measurement.  And without
          measurement, there is no way to understand the dynamics of what is
          happening to the business, for example, why the response rate to the
          newsletter is falling.  All the owner knows is one thing, the
          "what" - response is falling.  The owner wants to
          understand "why".  And there is no way to get to
          "why" without understanding the "who" first. 
          Response to the newsletter is falling because not as many customers
          are responding.  Who is not responding to the newsletter? 
          Is it new customers?  Is it repeat customers?  Is it
          "best customers"?  The owner realizes there is no
          definition of best customers either.  If these things were defined,
          the owner might be able to measure and understand what is happening. 
          Then another realization - not just defined, but tracked over time. 
          It does no good to define customers and count how many there is of
          each type; what the owner needs to know is how these counts are changing
          over time. 
          And since the specific topic at hand is the newsletter, what the
          owner needs to do is not only define the customers, but also to define
          them relative to the newsletter.  What percent of new customers
          respond now, and over time?  What percent of "old
          customers" respond, now, and over time?  What percent of
          "best customers" respond, now, and over time?  Knowing
          these numbers would almost certainly help the owner understand why
          response to the newsletter is falling overall.  The owner
          resolves to address this situation immediately by digging into the
          data.   
           Yes folks, the inevitable Drilling Down... 
          Next month, we'll follow the owner of IMissAsia.com down the path
          of defining, measuring, and tracking customer types.  Which group
          is responsible for the decline in newsletter response, and what can be
          done about it?  Only the data knows for sure... 
          If you would like to read the next installment of  
          Recency: The Web Retailing Example, click
          here. 
          
          ----------------------------------------- 
          If you are a consultant, agency, or software developer with clients needing action-oriented customer modeling or High ROI Customer Marketing program designs,
          click here. 
          If you are in SEO and the client isn't converting the additional
          visitors you generate, click here. 
          ----------------------------------------- 
           
           
          Questions from Fellow Drillers 
          ===================== 
          Jim's note: If you still don't know what RFM is
          and how it can be used to drive increased profitability in almost any business,
          read
          this.
           
          **Note to readers**: the promotion being discussed below is for an
          offline retailer using direct mail.  If you're not hip to control
          and test groups or halo effects, you might want to read this
          article first. 
          Q:  I've really enjoyed your book and software. 
          I'm a business consultant with the University of (deleted).  I'm
          in the process of developing a Continuing Education class (2 1/2 hour
          program) on Customer Database Management.  I plan to reference
          your book extensively and show off your software.  I will be sure
          to provide attendees your web  address where they can order your
          book. 
          A:  Well, I'm thrilled you like it and thanks for the
          promotion! 
          Q:  One of the areas I'm working on now, and would appreciate
          your input (perhaps a future newsletter topic), is what is the best
          way to organize data (target / control lists) for calculating ROI on
          promotions.  
          A:  Typically this is done with what is called a
          "promotional history table", which can either be part of the
          customer record or a unique table keyed by customer ID.  Each
          promotion has an "ID" and if the customer is selected for
          the promotion, the promotion ID is placed in the table with customer
          ID.  So you end up with (to use a spreadsheet analogy) for each
          row with a customer ID a list in the columns of the row flagging
          promotions they have been in.  This approach, of course, can
          create a non-symmetric table and can lead to issues down the line. 
          Another way to do it, which is more difficult to execute but
          sometimes preferred depending on what you are doing, is to have (to
          use a spreadsheet analogy) each row represent a customer and each
          column represent a promotion.  If the customer was in the
          promotion, the intersection of customer and promotion is
          "Y".  If the customer was not  in the promotion,
          the intersection of customer and promotion is "N". 
          This keeps the table
          symmetric and can make querying easier. 
          Q: I am trying to put together one promotion (for the client I
          mentioned above) and realized they have to track their promotion
          target list and control list.  If they begin doing a promotion
          every month, or every week, that's going to grow into a large number
          of lists. 
          A:  Yes, if you use lists.  I can't imagine weekly
          promotions for this kind of biz....unless they are going to different
          people each time...  Using the table approach described above
          might be easier. 
          Q:  Also, how do you handle a case where a customer was
          targeted for a promotion, does not respond, and it's time to do
          another promotion?  Wouldn't that customer be included in the
          next promotion (assuming that you have not given up, or written off
          the customer as gone), and if so, how would you handle the ROI
          calculation(s) if that customer responded to the next promotion in the
          sequence? 
          A:  As soon as you mail to that customer again you have
          "poisoned" the ROI measurement of the original mailing; you
          would have to cut off your measurement period before the second
          mailing if you wanted ROI on the original mailing.  But I
          doubt you will ever be able to measure the true effectiveness of the
          promotion with such short (weekly) time frames, because you cut-off
          any of the halo effects the
          promotion may have generated by stomping all over it with the results
          of the next promotion. 
          Now, you might not care about that, and I don't really know what
          the objective of the campaign is.  But if the objective is to
          maximize ROI, you won't be able to measure it if you poison the
          control group so quickly. Wait 30 days if you are just looking to
          measure the ROI of the promotion itself; wait 90 days if you are
          looking at the dynamics and ROI of customer retention campaigns. 
          If your plan is to sequence mailings, that is,
          "the promotion" is actually 4 successive weekly mailers, and
          you are measuring that against control, then you can mail every week
          and mail to whoever you want, as long as it isn't people in
          control.  You can set up a "decision tree" if you want
          that says "if they don't respond to #1, send #2 the next week; if
          they do respond to #1, skip a week and send #3 in week 3, that kind of
          thing.   
          Realize this though: 
          1.  You will not be able to measure the effect of any one
          mailer or decision tree sequence, only the effect of the entire
          promotion.  So you end up with a lot of work and you don't know
          what was effective.  
          2.  You can measure the effectiveness of an individual
          piece or sequence, you just have to set up control for it at each new
          branch or step, for example: 
          Mailer #1:  Initial mailer, total  = 1000 
          Test: 900 are mailed 
          Control: 100 are held back 
          You get results of:  Non-responders: 500  Responders: 400 
          Mailer #2: Re-mail non-responders = 500 
          Test: 450 are mailed 
          Control: 50 are held back 
          Mailer #3: Re-mail responders = 400 
          Test: 360 are mailed 
          Control: 40 are held back 
          So for a simple 2 step mailing, you have 3  control groups and
          3 test groups, and you can measure the effectiveness not only of the
          total campaign, but each piece of it.  If you don't set up
          control at each step, if the overall campaign is successful, you won't
          know if it came from initial response or the re-mails of responders or
          non-responders.  
          The ROI you asked about above would be the ROI of Mailer #2 - did
          not respond to initial mailer and were mailed again.  As long as
          control is composed of other people who received the first mailing and
          did not respond, you should be able to measure ROI very accurately for
          this sub-segment. 
          Jim 
           
          ----------------------------------------- 
          I can teach you and your staff the basics of high ROI
          customer marketing using your business model and
          customer data, and without using a lot of fancy software.  Not ready for the expense and resource drain of CRM? 
          Get CRM benefits using existing resources by  scheduling
          a workshop.  
          ----------------------------------------- 
           
          That's it for this month's edition of the Drilling Down Newsletter.  If you like the newsletter, please forward it to a friend - why don't you do this now while you are thinking of it?  Subscription instructions are at the top and bottom of the  newsletter for their convenience when subscribing. 
           
          Any comments on the newsletter (it's too long, too short, topic suggestions, etc.) please send them
          right along to me, along with any other questions on customer Valuation,
          Retention, Loyalty, and Defection right here. 
           
          'Til next time, keep Drilling Down! 
           
          - Jim Novo 
          What would you like to
        do now?
        Get
        the book with Free customer scoring software at: 
        Booklocker.com    
        Amazon.com     Barnes
        & Noble.com 
          Find
      Out Specifically What is in the Book 
          Learn Customer
          Marketing Models and Metrics (site article
          list) 
            |